Specialty Billing

Radiation Oncology Billing 2026: New Delivery Codes and Denial Prevention

Radiation oncology treatment planning review on monitors for radiation oncology billing 2026 guide
Effective January 1, 2026, CPT deleted the entire prior radiation treatment delivery code family and replaced it with three consolidated codes — the biggest structural change to radiation oncology billing in over a decade.

If your practice bills radiation therapy the same way it did in 2025, you're billing it wrong starting this year. CPT didn't just tweak a few descriptors for 2026 — it deleted the treatment delivery codes radiation oncology has used for years and replaced them with a three-tier complexity structure that applies the same way whether the treatment happens in a hospital outpatient department or a freestanding center. That's a genuine site-neutral coding change, and payers adopting it at different speeds is already creating real reimbursement gaps for practices that haven't adjusted.

Layer on top of that a decade of OIG audit findings averaging into the hundreds of millions of dollars, a CMS payment model that was announced, delayed repeatedly, and ultimately shelved without ever taking effect, and a reimbursement trend that's landed harder on practices than CMS's own projections suggested — and radiation oncology billing in 2026 has more moving parts than most specialties are tracking.

The 2026 Delivery Code Overhaul: 77402, 77407, 77412

This is the headline change and it affects every radiation oncology claim going forward. CPT deleted code 77401, Category III code 0394T, technical-component codes 77014, 77385, and 77386, and the Medicare-only G6001 through G6017 delivery G-codes. In their place: three consolidated codes based purely on delivery complexity, not on whether the treatment is 3D-CRT or IMRT.

CPT CodeComplexity LevelApplies To
77402Level 1 (least complex)Simpler delivery configurations, regardless of hospital or freestanding setting
77407Level 2 (intermediate)Moderate delivery complexity
77412Level 3 (most complex)Multiple isocenters, active motion management, and other high-complexity delivery scenarios

Code 77387, previously covering image guidance for target localization, becomes a professional-component-only code as of 2026 — its technical component now folds into the new consolidated delivery codes above rather than being billed separately. If your billing system or coding team is still mapping claims to the old 3D-CRT-versus-IMRT logic, every claim going out the door right now is running on outdated code selection logic.

Payers haven't all caught up: Reporting from AJMC found some commercial payers have been slow to reset their fee schedules to match the new 2026 coding structure — meaning practices are billing the new complexity-tiered codes but getting reimbursed at rates calibrated to the old code values. One oncologist quoted in that coverage warned the mismatch is severe enough in some cases to threaten clinic viability. Confirm your top commercial payers have actually updated their fee schedules to the new codes before assuming a denial or underpayment is a billing error on your end — it may be the payer's system that hasn't caught up.

Treatment Planning, Simulation and Brachytherapy Codes

The planning and simulation codes sit alongside the new delivery codes and haven't changed as dramatically, but they're where a lot of routine billing errors still happen. Treatment planning uses 77261 through 77263 depending on complexity — simple, intermediate, or complex based on the number of treatment areas, ports, and blocking required — and only one unit is billable per episode of care regardless of which level applies.

CPT CodeDescriptionKey Note
77261-77263Clinical treatment planning: simple, intermediate, complexOne unit per episode; complexity drives level, not the diagnosis
772953D radiotherapy plan, including dose-volume histogramsDistinct from IMRT planning code 77301
77301IMRT plan, including dose-volume histogramsHistorically the code driving the largest OIG overpayment findings when billed alongside separately-billed simulation
77373SBRT delivery, per fraction, any anatomic siteSingle code covers every fraction of fractionated SBRT anywhere in the body
77435SBRT treatment management, complete courseBilled once for the entire course, not per fraction
77770-77772HDR brachytherapy, interstitial/intracavitary by channel countBasic dosimetry (77300) is bundled in and should not be billed separately
TC/26 modifier logic: Radiation oncology codes carry both a professional component (modifier 26 — physician planning, interpretation, supervision) and a technical component (modifier TC — equipment, staff, facility overhead). Freestanding centers that own both the physician services and the equipment typically bill the global code with no modifier. In hospital-based settings, the radiation oncologist or physician group usually bills 26 while the hospital outpatient department bills TC or the global service under OPPS. Confirm current TC/26 applicability per code against the 2026 NCCI Policy Manual, since the delivery code consolidation changes which components are separately payable compared to prior years.

The CMS Radiation Oncology Model: What Actually Happened

If you've heard of the CMS Radiation Oncology Model and assumed it's operating somewhere, it isn't — and it never has been. CMS finalized the model in 2020 with a January 2022 start date, designed to test mandatory, prospective, site-neutral, episode-based bundled payments for a 90-day radiotherapy episode across specified cancer types. Congress statutorily blocked implementation before it started, CMS modified the model in November 2021 to remove liver cancer and brachytherapy from scope, Congress delayed it again to no earlier than 2023, and in August 2022 CMS issued a final rule delaying it indefinitely "to a date to be determined through future rulemaking." No restart date has been announced since.

What's actually alive right now is different legislation: the bipartisan ROCR Value-Based Program Act, which would direct CMS to establish an episode-based case-rate payment program through statute rather than CMMI rulemaking. ASTRO cites a 23 percent Medicare reimbursement decline for radiation oncology over the past decade as the problem ROCR is meant to address, and advocacy materials project it could save Medicare roughly $200 million over ten years. As of this writing it remains pending in Congress, not enacted — worth watching, not something to bill against yet.

Prior Authorization for Advanced Radiation Therapy

Advanced radiation therapy modalities — IMRT, SBRT, proton therapy — commonly require prior authorization, and eviCore is the most well-documented vendor managing this on behalf of payers including Aetna, Independence Administrators, 1199 SEIU, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana, among others. eviCore publishes payer-specific Radiation Oncology Coding Manuals with CPT code lists that get updated annually, which means a practice can't assume last year's prior auth code list still applies this year — it has to be checked per payer, every year.

Prior auth workflow for radiation oncology:
  • Pull the current-year payer-specific coding manual before scheduling any IMRT, SBRT, or proton therapy course — don't rely on last year's list
  • Submit treatment planning documentation, staging information, and the specific delivery technique requested, not just the diagnosis
  • Track authorization approval against the planned number of fractions — a course that runs longer than planned due to treatment breaks may need a supplemental authorization
  • Confirm which vendor manages prior auth for each payer — eviCore is the dominant vendor in radiation oncology specifically, and processes differ from imaging-focused vendors

OIG Audit History: A Decade of the Same Root Cause

Radiation oncology has one of the more consistent OIG audit patterns of any specialty, and it's worth understanding because it's still relevant to how MACs process claims today. In 2018, OIG found $25.8 million in IMRT planning overpayments, driven almost entirely by hospitals separately billing complex simulation code 77290 when it was already bundled into IMRT planning code 77301. In 2019, a broader review found $125.4 million in duplicate 3D-CRT planning payment savings opportunities across 1,379 hospitals between 2008 and 2017. A separate 2018 review found $7.2 million in unallowable advanced radiation therapy payments specifically at MAC Novitas Solutions.

The pattern behind all three findings: OIG's consistent conclusion was that claims-processing edits only caught bundled services billed on the same date of service as the primary procedure — but hospitals were billing the bundled component on a different date, sometimes weeks apart, which slipped past the edit logic entirely. If your practice bills simulation, planning, and delivery on separate claim submissions across different dates, verify your own internal logic catches bundling conflicts the same way a same-date edit would, because CMS's own system historically hasn't.

On the reimbursement side, CMS's official 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule estimate was a modest 1 percent aggregate cut to radiation oncology. ASTRO's own April 2026 member survey found a very different reality on the ground: more than two-thirds of radiation oncologists reported actual payment declines of 10 percent or more. That gap between the official projection and what practices are actually experiencing is worth flagging to your finance team directly — don't budget off the CMS aggregate number alone.

📋

Free Download: The 10-Point RCM Health Check

The billing gaps most practices don't catch until they show up as denials. Get the checklist — free, no spam.

On its way! Check your inbox — we'll send it within the hour.

We don't share your info. Unsubscribe any time.

Has Your Radiation Oncology Billing Caught Up to the 2026 Code Changes?

Rcmaxis reviews delivery code mapping, TC/26 modifier accuracy, and payer fee schedule alignment for radiation oncology practices navigating the 2026 overhaul. Most practices find real revenue sitting in payer systems still running on old code logic.

Get Your Free Revenue Assessment

References

  1. CMS. Radiation Oncology (RO) Model. cms.gov
  2. Federal Register. Radiation Oncology (RO) Model (2022-18541, indefinite delay). federalregister.gov
  3. HHS Office of Inspector General. Medicare Improperly Paid Hospitals Millions of Dollars for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Services (A-09-16-02033), 2018. oig.hhs.gov
  4. HHS Office of Inspector General. Medicare Could Have Saved Millions of Dollars in Payments for Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Planning Services (A-09-18-03026), 2019. oig.hhs.gov
  5. HHS Office of Inspector General. Payments Made by Novitas Solutions, Inc., to Hospitals for Certain Advanced Radiation Therapy Services (A-02-16-01006), 2018. oig.hhs.gov
  6. American Society for Radiation Oncology. Major Radiation Oncology Code Changes in 2026. astro.org, Winter 2026 ASTROnews
  7. American Society for Radiation Oncology. 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule Summary. astro.org
  8. Congress.gov. H.R.2120 — ROCR Value Based Program Act, 119th Congress. congress.gov
  9. CMS. Medicare NCCI Policy Manual, Chapter 9 — Radiology/Radiation Oncology. cms.gov
  10. AJMC. Payers Fail to Reset Radiation Oncology Payments to Match Coding Changes—and Some Clinics May Close, Leading Oncologist Says. ajmc.com